meta content='width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0' name='viewport'/>

Monday, May 21, 2018


They said Aids is not a medical crime but they can't answer if you ask them why it has affected Africans and African-Americans most?

They said Aids is not a medical crime but they can't answer if you ask them why it has affected Africans and African-Americans most?

Theories about why exactly AIDS and Ebola show such a strange affinity for blacks, not only in Africa but also amongst African-Americans, have been blowing across America for decades and no one has figured out how to put out.

What we, scientist Johan van Dongen, investigative journalist Joel Savage and family doctor and scientist Wolff Geisler, have figured out is that the U.S. government uses tax dollars to secretly develop diseases in a lab and then deploy it as a biological weapon to kill blacks. It's called ethnic cleansing. 

To find out why this all happened we have to dive back in the past. Because it was, amongst other scientific investigations, the transcript of a 1970 Congressional hearing on defense appropriations during which a certain Dr. Donald MacArthur of the Pentagon mentioned:

“A biological agent for which no natural immunity could be acquired”. But these so-called biological agents were no less than the precursors of  AIDS and Ebola.

A brief history of human experiments

As in 1896, Dr. Arthur Wentworth performed spinal taps on 29 children at a Children’s Hospital, in Boston USA, to determine if the procedure was harmful. 

After this human medical experiment, Dr. John Roberts of Philadelphia stated; “The non-therapeutic indication of Wentworth’s procedures can be labeled as human vivisection.” 

Four years later doctors from Walter Reed Hospital injected 22 Spanish immigrant workers in Cuba with the agent of yellow fever, paying them $100 if they survive and $200 if they contract the disease. 

At least they are paid for this medical experiments while in Africa corrupt leaders are paid for medical experiments on their population.

Because of these medical experiments new standards of ethical medical behavior was required and described in a document which enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.

Berlin Code of Ethics

The first country which announced specific standards towards human medical experiments was Germany when in 1900, the Berlin Code of Ethics came to light developed by the Royal Prussian Minister of Religion, Education, and Medical Affairs. 

He guaranteed that: Firstly, all medical interventions for other than diagnostic, healing, and immunization purposes, regardless of other legal or moral authorization are excluded under all circumstances if the human subject is a minor or not competent due to other reasons. 

Secondly, when the human subject has not given his unambiguous consent the consent is not preceded by a proper explanation of the possible negative consequences of the intervention.

But despite the Berlin Code worldwide scientists, the pharmaceutical industry and biowarfare establishments couldn't be stopped. 

For instance, in 1906, Dr. Richard Strong, a professor of tropical medicine at Harvard, carried out experiments with cholera on prisoners in the Philippines killing thirteen. This horrific event wasn't the only one in these days because subsequently there are many comparable cases. 

In 1913 Pennsylvania House of Representatives recorded that 146 children had been inoculated with syphilis, “through the courtesy of the various hospitals” and that 15 children in St. Vincent’s House in Philadelphia had had their eyes tested with tuberculin. Several of these children became permanently blind. The experimenters were not punished.

Two years later, in 1915, a doctor in Mississippi, working for the U.S. Public Health Office, produces Pellagra in twelve Mississippi inmates in an attempt to discover a cure for the disease.

In the period of 1919-1922 testicular transplant experiments on five hundred prisoners at San Quentin, followed up in 1927, when Carrie Buck of Charlottesville is legally sterilized against her will at the Virginia Colony Home for the Mentally Infirm. 

Carrie Buck was the mentally normal daughter of a mentally retarded mother, but under the Virginia law, she was declared potentially capable of having a “less than normal child.”

In the 1930's, no less than seventeen states in the U.S. have laws permitting forced sterilization; “The settlement of Poe v. Lynchburg Training School and Hospital” in 1981, brought to an end the Virginia law. 

It is estimated that as many as 10,000 perfectly normal women were forcibly sterilized for “legal” reasons including alcoholism, prostitution, and criminal behavior in general.

Around 1931, Dr. Cornelius Rhoads, a pathologist, conducted a cancer experiment in Puerto Rico, under the auspices of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Investigations. Dr. Rhoads was been accused of purposely infecting his Puerto Rican subjects with cancer cells. 

Thirteen of the subjects died. A Puerto Rican physician uncovered the experiment after an investigation and the facts covered-up.

Despite Rhoads’ handwritten statements that the Puerto Rican population should be eradicated, Rhoads went on to establish U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Maryland, Utah, and Panama and was later named to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. 

Rhoads was also responsible for the radiation experiments on prisoners, hospital patients, and soldiers. The American Association for Cancer Research honored him by naming its exemplary scientist award the Cornelius Rhoads Award.

An ordinary summary of some more medical experiments on human

1932-1972: U.S. Public Health Service study in Tuskegee, Alabama of more than 400 black sharecroppers observed for the natural course of untreated syphilis.

1942-1943: Freezing experiments at Dachau concentration camp. Coagulation experiments on Catholic priests at Dachau concentration camp.

1943: Refrigeration experiment conducted on sixteen mentally disabled patients who were placed in refrigerated cabinets at 30 degrees Fahrenheit, for 120 hours, at University of Cincinnati Hospital., “to study the effect of frigid temperature on mental disorders.”

1942-1944: U.S. Chemical Warfare Service conducts mustard gas experiments on thousands of servicemen.

1942-1945: Malaria experiments at Dachau concentration camp on more than twelve hundred prisoners.

1943: Epidemic jaundice experiments at Natzweiler concentration camp.

1943-1944: Phosphorus burn experiments at Buchenwald concentration camp.

1944: Manhattan Project injection of 4.7 micrograms of plutonium into soldiers at Oak Ridge.

1944: Seawater experiment on sixty Gypsies who were given only saltwater to drink at Dachau concentration camp.

1944-1946: University of Chicago Medical School professor Dr. Alf Alving conducts malaria experiments on more than 400 Illinois prisoners.

1945: Manhattan Project injection of plutonium into three patients at Billings Hospital at University of Chicago.

1945: Malaria experiment on 800 prisoners in Atlanta.

The opening of Nuremberg Doctors Trial by U.S. Military Tribunal in 1946

You and us know that the aforementioned medical experiments on ordinary human beings aren't permissible at all under any circumstances when provided without knowledge of those involved. 

But again, in the aforementioned dates, it all was common knowledge. And after the arrival of The Nuremberg Code, the demands for medical experiments on human beings didn't fade away.

About six months after I was born, on December 9, 1946, an American military tribunal opened criminal proceedings against 23 leading German physicians and administrators for their willing participation in war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Brigadier General Telford Taylor was Chief of Counsel, during the Doctors Trial. In Taylor's own words, from the opening statement by the prosecution: “The defendants, in this case, are charged with murders, tortures, and other atrocities committed in the name of medical science. 

The victims of these crimes are numbered in the hundreds of thousands. A handful only is still alive; a few of the survivors will appear in this courtroom. But most of these miserable victims were slaughtered outright or died in the course of the tortures to which they were subjected. For the most part, they are nameless dead. 

To their murderers, these wretched people were not individuals at all. They came in wholesale lots and were treated worse than animals.”

But was Brigadier General Telford Taylor aware of what was going to happen in Africa where man-made diseases aids and Ebola was about to appear?

In Nazi Germany, German physicians planned and enacted the "Euthanasia" Program, the systematic killing of those they deemed "unworthy of life." 

The victims included the institutionalized mentally ill and physically impaired. Further, during World War II, German physicians conducted pseudoscientific medical experiments utilizing thousands of concentration camp prisoners without their consent. 

Most died or were permanently impaired as a result. Jews, Poles, Russians, and Roma (Gypsies) were the most common victims of experimentation. What about blacks? They weren't discussed because they were not counted as human beings but compared as some sort of monkeys hanging in a tree or meant for slavery...

After almost 140 days of proceedings, including the testimony of 85 witnesses and the submission of almost 1,500 documents, the American judges pronounced their verdict on August 20, 1947. Sixteen of the doctors were found guilty. Seven were sentenced to death. They were executed on June 2, 1948. But who is going to execute those who are responsible for Aids and Ebola?

The Nuremberg Code 1947 and Permissible Medical Experiments

Within the “BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL” No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448, December 7, 1996, the CIRP Introduction was published.

CIRP Introduction

The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.

This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behavior for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. 

The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.

This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided, as well as that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.

The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have the legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior forms of constraint or coercion.

And should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment.

The method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The nine Nuremberg Code requirements

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rest upon each individual who initiates direct, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.

The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

If you ask WHO and CDC how could Ebola that occurred in Congo in 1976, appeared again in Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone in 2014? They still have no answer because it's a bioweapon like Aids

If you ask WHO and CDC how could Ebola that occurred in Congo in 1976, appeared again in Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone in 2014? They still have no answer because it's a bioweapon like Aids

No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.

The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to be impossible.

During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Dear readers the aforementioned data do reveal the outcome of medical experiments throughout the last century. So, it doesn't come as a surprise that we started our blog 'Secrets of Aids and Ebola facts Journal' in order to expose the truth about biowarfare experiments on Africans causing aids and Ebola at the end.

Yes, we wrote an indictment to the International Court of Law in The Haque in order to prosecute those responsible for aids and Ebola. Once the Nuremberg Code come to live and once we hope the same will happen for Africa. And how we name that so-called “Code” is up to you dear readers. Our suggestion is “The African Aids And Ebola Code,” and the search for justice for Africans.

1 comment:

  1. This is really fascinating, You're an overly professional blogger.
    I've joined your rss feed and sit up for looking for
    more of your magnificent post. Also, I have shared your web site in my social networks