meta content='width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0' name='viewport'/>

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

WHEN WILL AFRICA EMBRACE DNA-FORENSIC METHOD FOR CRIME INVESTIGATION?


Forensic identification officer at a crime scene, using a swab to absorb saliva from the mouth of a beer bottle to find the perpetrator


Forensic identification officer at a crime scene, using a swab to absorb saliva from the mouth of a beer bottle to find the perpetrator


Decades ago, crimes were painstakingly investigated. Some detectives were using magnifying glass around the world with success or without success since certain investigations came to a standstill because comparative analysis of genetics was not carried out at that time.



This enabled crime to rise sporadically in many parts of the world. Crime rates reached unprecedented peaks in the ‘80s and early ‘90s in America, Asia, Africa, and the United Kingdom. It wasn’t until 1995 that the height of crime began declining due to new development in solving crime through technology in the laboratory.

DNA examination, or genetic fingerprinting, was used in the investigation of crimes in the 20th century. Today, in a costly way of examining evidence, it is getting closer to the routine, and the technology has been so advanced that you can detect DNA particles that are not visible to the eye. 

The success of forensic science and the use of laboratory investigations have transformed the judicial process, and the appearance of the results of genetic examinations in court seemed to have made it possible to find undeniable evidence of the guilt of the criminals. 

However, Africa is still holding on tightly to those primitive methods of crime investigation, resulting in the increase of crime in many countries. For example, after the fall of Apartheid, the regime which deprived blacks of equal access to education, and many other benefits, crime has increased in South Africa putting the lives people in danger every minute.

According to a crime rate survey, by the leadership of the South African police, every day, about 51 people die in South Africa, and about 150 women become victims of rape. The published data suggest that the crime rate increased by 4.9% compared to last year.

Since the beginning of March 2017 to March 2018, a total of 18,673 people have been killed. The Law Enforcement Minister, Nati Nhleko acknowledged that despite the efforts being made, the country continues to plunge into a culture of violence. Illiteracy and poverty are the sources of crimes in the country which hasn’t fully embraced DNA and forensic methods in solving a crime.

DNA is a molecule that contains genetic instructions and in many ways determines how we look. 99.9% of our DNA is identical to that of other people, but it is the remaining 0.1% that distinguishes us as individuals. 

They are important for forensic geneticists, who use this data to create a DNA profile from a biomaterial from the crime scene. The sample is compared to the reference DNA of the suspect. To calculate how much the probability that a person is involved in a crime.

Since such a large part of our DNA is almost the same, forensic scientists do not analyze DNA completely. It would be very expensive. Instead, they usually concentrate on short, highly variable regions of repetitive DNA, called short tandem repeats, or STR. 

In individuals, they differ and can be used as genetic markers to create a DNA profile that is extremely rare among unrelated individuals. When a DNA profile is created from a sample taken from the crime scene, it can be compared with other profiles already listed in the national base, and with the DNA of the suspect and the victim. 

If both profiles are identical, it is a complete match; partial matching of profiles is also possible. Once a match is found, you can calculate how high the probability of a particular person. Extracting DNA profiles from various body tissues is not always easy.

So, it is relatively easy to create a DNA profile from a fresh sample of blood, saliva, and sperm, but getting DNA from objects that a person has touched is not an easy task. Relatively recently, it became clear that a lot of useful information was hidden at the crime scene, which can be interpreted and presented to the court with the help of science. 

Even though South Africa is one of the most violent countries in the world, Africa has to move forward as technology advances to embrace forensic methods in crime investigation.

Not South Africa, alone, crime is escalating rapidly but also throughout many African countries, including Ghana. 

Thus, without embracing these modern methods for crime investigation, dealing with criminals and putting them behind bars will be a daunting task as well as giving them the chance to commit more crime.

VACCINATION COVERUP EXPOSED BY INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST SHARYL ATTKISSON


Sharyl Attkisson

Sharyl Attkisson


Dr. Zimmerman was the government’s top expert witness and had testified that vaccines didn’t cause autism. The debate was declared over. But now Dr. Zimmerman has provided remarkable new information. 

He claims that during the vaccine hearings all those years ago, he privately told government lawyers that vaccines can, and did cause autism in some children.



Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson has broken several major stories in US news, and this latest bombshell is just another of an example of her fearless pursuit of the truth in her investigations and reporting.  

Her latest "Full Measure" episode, The Vaccine Debate, features the true story of Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, a pediatric neurologist who was the government’s own expert witness in secret vaccine court proceedings.  

Though his testimony was used to promote the government and big Pharma's lies that vaccinations don't cause autism, he privately told government lawyers that vaccines can, and did cause autism in some children.

According to the interview on "Full Measure":

Dr. Zimmerman was the government’s top expert witness and had testified that vaccines didn’t cause autism. The debate was declared over.

But now Dr. Zimmerman has provided remarkable new information. He claims that during the vaccine hearings all those years ago, he privately told government lawyers that vaccines can, and did cause autism in some children. That turnabout from the government’s own chief medical expert stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate. If the public were to find out.

And he has come forward and explained how he told the United States government vaccines can cause autism in a certain subset of children and the United States government, the Department of Justice suppressed his true opinions.
This was one of the most consequential frauds, arguably in human history.

Seeing that Attkisson has been harassed and censored for her other investigative work, and this is likely to find similar attacks.  This is why the guys at Brigheon.com have archived the original report there.  


Here's the full transcript of the report

Today we investigate one of the biggest medical controversies of our time: vaccines. There’s little dispute about this much– vaccines save many lives, and rarely, they injure or kill. A special federal vaccine court has paid out billions for injuries from brain damage to death. But not for the form of brain injury we call autism. 

Now—we have remarkable new information: a respected pro-vaccine medical expert used by the federal government to debunk the vaccine-autism link says vaccines can cause autism after all. He claims he told that to government officials long ago, but they kept it secret.

Yates Hazlehurst was born February 11, 2000. Everything was normal, according to his medical records, until he suffered a severe reaction to vaccinations. Rolf Hazlehurst is Yates’ dad.

Rolf Hazlehurst: And at first, I didn’t believe it. I did not think that I did not believe that vaccines could cause autism. I didn’t believe it.

But there’s a hard reality for Yates. The trademark brain disease, pain and inability to communicate that’s common with severe autism.

In 2007, Yates’ father sued over his son’s injuries in the little known Federal Vaccine court. It was one of more than 5000 vaccine-autism claims.

Congress created the vaccine court in 1988, in consultation with the pharmaceutical industry. In the special court, vaccine makers don’t defend their products—the federal government does it for them, using lawyers from the Justice Department. Money for victims comes from us, not the pharmaceutical industry, through patient fees added to every vaccine is given.

Denise Vowell: Our hearings are all closed to the public. And that’s statutory.

In 2007, Yates’ case and nearly all the other vaccine-autism claims lost. The decision was based largely on the expert opinion of this man, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, a world-renowned pediatric neurologist shown here at a lecture.

Dr. Zimmerman was the government’s top expert witness and had testified that vaccines didn’t cause autism. The debate was declared over.

But now Dr. Zimmerman has provided remarkable new information. He claims that during the vaccine hearings all those years ago, he privately told government lawyers that vaccines can, and did cause autism in some children. 

That turnabout from the government’s own chief medical expert stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate. If the public were to find out.

Hazlehurst: And he has come forward and explained how he told the United States government vaccines can cause autism in a certain subset of children and United States government, the Department of Justice suppressed his true opinions.

Hazlehurst discovered that later when Dr. Zimmerman evaluated Yates as a teenager. That’s when he partnered with vaccine safety advocate Robert F. Kennedy, Junior—who has a voice condition.

Kennedy: This was one of the most consequential frauds, arguably in human history.

Kennedy was instrumental in convincing Dr. Zimmerman to document his remarkable claim of the government covering up his true expert opinion on vaccines and autism.

Dr. Zimmerman declined our interview request and referred us to his sworn affidavit. It says: On June 15, 2007, he took aside the Department of Justice—or DOJ lawyers he worked for defending vaccines in vaccine court. 

He told them that he’d discovered “exceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism.” “I explained that in a subset of children, vaccine-induced fever and immune stimulation did cause regressive brain disease with features of autism spectrum disorder.”

Kennedy: This panicked the two DOJ attorneys and they immediately fired Zimmerman. That was on a Friday and over the weekend they called Zimmerman and said his services would no longer be needed. They wanted to silence him.

Days after the Department of Justice lawyers fired Dr. Zimmerman as their expert witness, he alleges, they went on to misrepresent his opinion to continue to debunk autism claims. Records show that on June 18, 2007, a DOJ attorney Dr. Zimmerman spoke to told vaccine court, “We know [Dr. Zimmerman’s] views on the issue…There is no scientific basis for a connection” between vaccines and autism. 

Dr. Zimmerman now calls that “highly misleading.” The former DOJ lawyer didn’t return our calls and emails. Kennedy has filed a fraud complaint with the Justice Department Inspector General, who told us they don’t “comment on investigations or potential investigations.”

Meantime, CDC—which promotes vaccines and monitors vaccine safety– never disclosed that the government’s own one-time medical expert concluded vaccines can cause autism – and to this day public health officials deny that’s the case.

Dr. Anne Schuchat: “Based on dozens of studies and everything I know as a physician and a scientist, there’s no link between autism and vaccines.”

CDC declined our interview request. In addition to filing a fraud complaint, Kennedy has delivered Dr. Zimmerman’s affidavit to leaders on Capitol Hill. But there he claims, is another key part of this story: roadblocks set up by the pharmaceutical industry—or PhRMA.

Kennedy: But everybody takes money from PhRMA so they’ve all been corrupted. And it’s almost impossible to get anything done on Capitol Hill.

Kennedy, a Democrat, isn’t the only one claiming vaccine industry money rules the day. We spoke to 11 current and former members of Congress and staff who claim they faced pressure, bullying or threats when they raised vaccine safety questions. Several of them agreed to appear on camera.

Burton: There’s no question in my mind whatsoever that the pharmaceutical industry had great influence with people over at the CDC and FDA. There’s no question in my mind.

Republican Dan Burton—former Chairman of the House Oversight Committee—has an autistic grandson.

Burton: I am not against vaccinations.

He pursued vaccine investigations in the early 2000s. Beth Clay was one of his staffers.

Clay: There was a lot of pressure from people on the Hill.

When you say people on the hill were exerting pressure, what kind of people? Colleagues?

Clay: Colleagues, there were pharmaceutical lobbyists. The pharmaceutical lobbyists had, you know, they are the same people that have been entrenched. They can walk into any office in Capitol Hill, and they’ll talk to staff, they’ll talk to members and they’ll encourage them to discourage our investigation.

Sharyl: At the risk of stating the obvious why did they have that kind of access to members?

Clay: It’s money. And if you look at the donations over the last 20 years, the pharmaceutical industry, and Republican and Democrat, they’re nonpartisan. They put money everywhere.

Former Congressman, Dr. Dave Weldon, a Republican, says he got the message loud and clear.

Sharyl: If you would want to hold a hearing on an issue like vaccines and autism, your own leadership might fight you on that because of the financial influence, the pharmaceutical industry

Dave Weldon: They wouldn’t fight you. They’d kill it. It’s dead. They don’t even want to discuss it. It’s dead on arrival. If you, if you as an individual member want to take on the pharmaceutical industries. It forgets it.

Sharyl: Can you describe an incident or just how it, how that would go?
Weldon: It would typically be in a hallway or the street and people would come up to you and say, “You know, you really need to, you know, back off on this. It could be, it could be bad for the community or bad for the country or bad for you.”

Weldon says he’s generally pro-vaccine, depending on the patient and the shot—and gives flu shots to adults. We asked him to review Dr. Zimmerman’s new affidavit.

Weldon: I found his affidavit and testimony through that affidavit to be consistent with my opinions. That some children can get an autism spectrum disorder from a vaccine.

Republican Bill Posey is a current member of Congress.

Rep. Bill Posey: I don’t have to tell you that industry is a very, very powerful industry. Matter of fact, I don’t know of anyone more powerful than that industry.

Posey says his own party leaders twice promised to hold hearings on the topic, only to scuttle them in the end.

Hazlehurst – who happens to be a criminal prosecutor– was scheduled to be a witness at one such Congressional hearing. Two weeks before the hearing in 2013, he briefed Congressional staff.

Hazlehurst: I presented at that Congressional briefing and I explained in that hearing, if I did to a criminal in a court of law what the United States Department of Justice did to vaccine injured children, I would be disbarred and I would be facing criminal charges. I think that scared the hell out of them.

The hearing was abruptly cancelled. Meantime, Dr. Zimmerman – the one-time expert used to debunk vaccine-autism claims—now says several of his own patients got autism from vaccines. They include Yates Hazlehurst.

Today, with intensive treatment, Yates is doing better. His dad hopes the new testimony from a most unlikely source will get new attention.

Hazlehurst: A child that was unnecessarily sacrificed and hopefully some good, will come from his suffering.

The lobby group representing the pharmaceutical industry wouldn’t agree to an interview but told us they’re working with Congress and other stakeholders on the importance and safety of vaccines to support the health and safety of individuals and communities.


Source: Freedom Outpost - by Tim Brown

Sunday, January 13, 2019

SHOCKING ANALYSIS OF VACCINES REVEALED BY ITALIAN NEWSPAPER


Pharmaceutical companies wouldn't admit the danger of contaminated vaccines because of profit

Pharmaceutical companies wouldn't admit the danger of contaminated vaccines because of profit




The Italian newspaper, 'Il Tempo,' has joined other newspapers worldwide to reveal shocking analysis of vaccines. The question is: What's exactly in a vaccine that always receives the strongest opposition from the pharmaceutical industry? 

Moreover, an enormous amount of lobbyist started to attack anti-vax movements and scientists or those who oppose contaminated vaccines. But every once in a while there is some light at the horizon when politicians are involved or well-qualified institutes are ringing the bell. 

Anyway, the light shines more brightly when a newspaper discussed and publish the results of an investigation after very dangerous and contaminated vaccines. “IL TEMPO.”

Normally newspapers and journalists proclaim everything that the pharmaceutical industry want them to say because of ordinary profits. 

Well, there's also a killer scientist, Dr. Hillary Koprowski engaged in the mass vaccination of Congolese with contaminated vaccines against polio resulting in many deadly diseases including Ebola as discussed in the USA Senate and World Health Organization. 

These vaccines were full of wild viruses amongst them a retrovirus which have induced AIDS.




Finally, a laboratory has investigated exactly what is being injected into our children and it's not the first investigation published. According to this study, that appears to differ from what is written on the package leaflet. 

If the research results of Corvelva are correct, this information is a bomb under the already waning confidence in the mass vaccination programs. It would mean that mistrust is necessary, as is our call for independent scientific research.

Italian newspaper Il Tempo

A heading of the Italian newspaper Il Tempo of December 23, 2018, stated: ANALISI CHOC SU DUE LOTTI VACCINI” - Analisi scioccante dei vaccini.

This heading translated means; “Shocking analysis of vaccines,” a conclusion made after months of scientific investigation financed by the Italian Society of Biologists.

The idea originally came from the previous Italian Parliamentary Committee on depleted uranium (see link below). It is a fact that many deaths and illnesses within the Italian Army are related to the conditions under which the army operated. 

But there was another common denominator: to participate in the peace mission in Afghanistan or Lebanon or Iraq or wherever the troops were given a high number of contaminated vaccines resulting in illnesses and death.

Vincenzo D'Anna, the current president of the Italian Professional Association of Biologists, was at that time a member of the Italian Parliament and wondered whether these vaccinations could be the cause of the health problems in soldiers. (more info see our blog post:



As insiders, we know all the difficulties to have vaccines investigated but this time a member of the Italian Parliament is ringing the bell and he isn't even a whistleblower like us. 

But even then he has had quite some feet in the earth to find an independent person who was willing to control various batches of commonly used vaccines. But the inquiry report of the Italian Chamber of Deputies Resolution puts it very clear:

"Italian parliamentary commission of inquiry into cases of death and severe illnesses affecting Italian personnel assigned to military missions abroad, firing ranges and the sites where munitions are stocked, on the exposure to particular chemical, toxic and radiological factors."

"With a possible pathogenic effect and administration of vaccines, with special attention to the effect of depleted uranium shells and of the dispersion in the environment of nanoparticles of heavy minerals produced by the explosion of warfare material and any related interaction.”

After the shocking analysis of vaccines the AIFA (the Italian Medicines Evaluation Board) and the EMA (European Medicines Agency), should be informed immediately with no time to waste”, says D'Anna, the current chairman of the Italian professional association of biologists.

Vincenzo D'Anna chairman of the Italian professional association of biologists

According to Vicenzo D'Anna these exceptional results, published in international scientific journals, will be reported to the AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency), the EMA European Medicines Agency, the NAS unit of the Carabinieri and a public prosecutor.

IL TEMPO interview with Vincenzo D'Anna

Il Tempo- You are the chairman of the national professional association for biologists. I have to ask you the usual question: do you belong to the radical anti-vaxxers?

D'Anna- I? Definitely not. Like other biologists, I believe vaccines are useful. I am just a pro-vaxxer. And demonstrating the usefulness of vaccines was not the goal of this analysis. Central to this research was the question of the quality of this product on the market and not the usefulness of this product.

Il Tempo- And what were the results of these tests?

D'Anna- Dozens of polluting substances have been found in various batches. And furthermore, substances have been found that should not be in it.

Il Tempo- Do not be in it? What do you mean exactly?

D'Anna- Agrochemicals, herbicides, glyphosate, antibiotics, medicines for malaria.

Il Tempo- Wait a minute. I am not a scientist. I understand that herbicides do not belong in a vaccine. But why should antibiotics not be included?

D'Anna- An antibiotic does not belong in a vaccine. This also applies to anti-malarial medications and herbicides. Several pollutants were found that should not have been in it.

Il Tempo- In minimum quantities I hope …?

D'Anna- Of course, we are talking about nanograms and nanoparticles. But remember that these particles are injected, not swallowed. The body absorbs them and cannot excrete them in some cases, such as in the case of aluminum. 

But it is not for us to determine the harmfulness or toxicity of these substances. There was also something else from the tests. For example, the rubella virus was not present; that is fraud because the thousands of children who have received this vaccine are not protected against red dogs. In addition, substances have been found that do not belong in a vaccine, such as human fetal DNA.

Il Tempo - Fetal DNA?

D'Anna- Yes, to produce the required dose, the virus must be cultured on human fetal DNA from an aborted embryo, or on chicken eggs. This also explains the presence of herbicides, glyphosate, agrochemicals, and antiparasitic agents.

Il Tempo- But those traces, even if they are very small quantities, should not be in a vaccine?

D'Anna- Of course not.

Il Tempo- And have public laboratory tests already been carried out on these parties?

D'Anna- Have you already seen them? Do you know the results? Legal status exists and the manufacturer is not obliged to test the end product. The government should carry out these tests. But I have not seen a single test. 

Also because a possible result is kept secret. Just as Coca-Cola does not reveal its recipe, the producer of a vaccine also wants the competition to stop copying the production process of the vaccine.

Il Tempo- But what would have happened if the state had found these results? 
D'Anna-Dan had something to explain to the vaccine producer. One question should be: How can someone make antibodies against the rubella virus if there are no antigens in the vaccine? 

As far as the vaccine against tetanus, diphtheria, etc. is concerned, the different toxoids (protein antigens) are not found separately, but in the form of a large macromolecule at the bottom of the test tube. That molecule did not react to trypsin.

Il Tempo- You are now difficult to follow. The point is this: Do you mean to say that this should not happen in vaccines?

D'Anna- Exactly. There should be four different proteins present, which split off under the influence of trypsin. That does not happen, so that means that such a macromolecule contains something else that keeps the proteins together. 

We will report these results to AIFA and EMA, also to see if they have more knowledge about this. Il Tempo- The rubella virus should have been in the first batches, but that was not there. That the vaccine is not effective, is clear to me. Less clear are the effects of the macromolecule in the other vaccines?

D'Anna - First: even if it were legal and innocent, the authorities and consumers would have to be informed. Secondly, a significant number of peptides (short chains of amino acids) of bacterial origin were found in these vaccines, probably from bacteria that happened to be there and contaminated the culture. 

In addition, 65 chemical pollutants have been found, 35% of which we know the substance involved (we have now performed the repeat tests on one batch, the only batch that was available in Italy in over a year). 7 substances are chemical toxins, but even that we are not sure yet until the structure is confirmed with a standard control test.

Il Tempo - And after that?

D'Anna - After that, AIFA and EMA must replicate our analyzes and publish the results and their evaluation. We do our part. For example, on January 25, we have planned an important event in Rome entitled "Safe Vaccination" in which international and Italian scientists participate, such as Giulio Tarro, who has recently been named the best virologist in the US.
These analyzes will also feed the scientific debate. "