meta content='width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0' name='viewport'/>

Tuesday, June 19, 2018

10 FALSE VACCINE SAFETY THEORY CAUSING IATROGENIC DISEASES


The life of a beautiful baby destroyed by a vaccine

The life of a beautiful baby destroyed by a vaccine


According to The World Mercury Project Team WMP, we are living in an age where parents increasingly report that their typically developing children declined cognitively and physically after receiving vaccines.


Despite the sound science supporting these parent claims, government agencies and mainstream media continue issuing the now shopworn mantra that vaccines are “safe and effective” ignoring published research and the even common sense that indicate otherwise.

The WMP has put together a list of the most common misrepresentations in the vaccine safety debate and provided the facts and references that support the reality that vaccines can and do cause injuries including autism and many other adverse health outcomes.

First claim: Vaccines save lives

It goes without saying this statement is at the least debatable. Because there is an immense growing body of research that suggests vaccines may cause more injury and death than the diseases they were meant to protect us from.

Vaccines can also cause permanent disability and death in individuals who are more susceptible to injury from vaccines or vaccine ingredients. Physicians and vaccine-injured individuals are encouraged to report injuries to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). 

It’s estimated that only 1% of injuries are even reported to VAERS, yet payments totaling nearly 4 billion dollars have been made since 1988. That taxpayer-funded payout amount continues to rise at an alarming rate.

Despite the trend in medicine to personalize treatments and medications, the current vaccine program is a “one size fits all” policy.

Second claim: Vaccines don’t cause autism

The American National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid many vaccine-induced autism claims. Even the industry-compromised mainstream media has covered vaccine-induced autism, including Dr. Sanjay Gupta and CNN with the widely-reported Hannah Poling case.

The CDC published studies claiming no link between thimerosal and autism are conflicted, fraudulent and manipulated to suppress the autism link. However, they still show that vaccines cause grave neurological injuries such as tics.

Another CDC vaccine safety scientist turned whistleblower, and author of several of the CDC autism studies, Dr. William Thompson, claims senior CDC officials asked him and his colleagues to lie about scientific fraud destruction of evidence in critical vaccine safety research regarding the causative relationship between childhood vaccines and autism.

Furthermore, the World Mercury Project has collected over 80 studies connecting the dots between the vaccine preservative, thimerosal, and autism. Studies on other vaccine ingredients and links to disease are also accumulating.

The safety of combining vaccines, which include aborted fetal tissue, mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, animal and human DNA, and more, in infants and young children, has not been tested.

Third claim: All vaccines have been rigorously tested and are completely safe

This statement is patently false. The reason Congress exempted vaccine makers from liability in 1986 was that vaccines were causing harm. Since the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act went into effect, the federal government program has paid out 3.8 billion dollars in vaccine injuries and death.

In 2011, the Supreme Court ruled that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe and besides that, the current CDC pediatric schedule recommends children receive as many as nine vaccines all at the same office visit. 

The safety of combining vaccines, which include aborted fetal tissue, mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, animal and human DNA in infants and young children has not been tested.

In contradiction with official statements, there are no large-scale studies comparing health outcomes in vaccinated children or those who haven’t received vaccines. 

However, a recent peer-reviewed study found that vaccinated children had an increased risk of autism (4.2 times), ADHD (4.2 times), learning disabilities (5.2 times), eczema (2.9 times) and an astounding 30 times the risk of allergic rhinitis compared to unvaccinated children.

Moreover, in 2016, the Vaccine Injury Adverse Reporting System (VAERS) collected 59,117 reports of adverse events from vaccines, including 432 deaths and no less than 1091 permanent disabilities, 4,132 hospitalizations and 10,284 emergency room visits. 

According to HHS, the reported events are only 1% of the actual number. Therefore, the U.S is likely experiencing millions of adverse reactions from vaccines per year.

Fourth claim:  vaccinations produce herd immunity and prevent dangerous, even deadly, diseases. Anti-vaxxers are causing epidemics and eroding the public trust

Herd immunity cannot be achieved through vaccination if vaccines aren’t effective. The Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine is just one that isn’t working. Mumps cases in the U.S. have been on the rise in recent years with over 5,000 cases reported in 2016, more than any year in the past decade, and they are occurring in highly vaccinated populations. 

Recent outbreaks of a disease in vaccinated populations are proving that all vaccines are not efficacious. Additionally, immunity from vaccines is usually temporary unlike the lifelong immunity typically produced by experiencing a childhood illness.

In 2010, two former Merck virologists filed a federal lawsuit claiming that Merck committed fraud in lying about the efficacy of the mumps component of their MMR vaccine. The suit, now in the hands of a federal judge, charges that Merck was aware of the declining efficacy of the mumps vaccine but still claimed it was 95% effective.

As the CDC continues to deny that there is a vaccine safety problem, studies show that the biggest impediment to broad vaccine acceptance and coverage is public mistrust of government regulators.

Bernadine Healy, former director of the National Institutes of Health, said that public distrust is growing because of inaction on the part of agencies regarding vaccine safety.

Only polio that is diagnosed now in America is the vaccine strain and those cases are compensated in Vaccine Court.

Ironically, many of today’s vaccines don’t actually prevent the vaccinated individual from harboring and transmitting the disease in question. This is true of pertussis, diphtheria, and as already noted, polio.

The death rate from measles as far back as 1922 was extremely low—4.3 in 100,000. Consider that this was nearly 100 years ago—before electric refrigerators, before washing machines, before antibiotics, and IV hydration, and the advances of modern medicine.

Eight years before the measles vaccine was introduced, children went to school, and even to Disneyland, which opened its doors in 1955, and mothers didn't live in fear of routine illnesses like measles.

Not only has thimerosal never been completely taken out of vaccines, but much more aluminum was—and continues to be—added, again with no scientific research to support the safety of doing so.

Fifth claim: Thimerosal (ethyl mercury) was taken out of vaccines in 1999 and autism rates still continued to rise. Also, the ethyl mercury in vaccines is less toxic than methylmercury

Between 1999 and 2003, thimerosal was being gradually removed from the Hep B, Hib and DTaP vaccines. However, the exposure to thimerosal due to flu shots was simultaneously ramping up. 

Flu shots were originally recommended for pregnant women in 1997, but, initially, uptake of these shots was low (only 12.4% by 2002). In 2004, the CDC recommended flu shots for all pregnant women in any trimester. 

By 2012-2013, uptake of flu shots during pregnancy had steadily increased to approximately 50%. So, the children born after 2004 were increasingly likely to have been exposed to thimerosal in utero, and a lot of it.

Concurrently, in 2001, the CDC recommended flu vaccines for high-risk infants over six months of age. In January 2003, the CDC recommended routine annual flu shots for all children starting at six months of age. Coverage initially was very low. In the 2002–2003 and 2003–2004 inuenza seasons, only 4.4% and 8.4% of children,

Respectively, were fully vaccinated against flu. In the years 2004-2005 flu season, the childhood uptake rate had shot up to 48%.

In the years after the phase-out of mercury in the Hep B, Hib, and DTaP, children were increasingly being exposed to thimerosal through flu shots. In 2004, over 90% of the flu shot supply was preserved with thimerosal.

In fact, there is no justification or whatsoever for injecting mercury, a known neurotoxin, into anyone, but definitely not pregnant women and children. 

The developing fetus is especially vulnerable to mercury exposure because fetal cord blood mercury levels are typically about double the mother’s mercury blood levels. Approximately 36 million flu shots containing 25 mcg. of mercury are in the supply for the 2017-2018 flu season.

A 2017 CDC study reviewing data from the 2010-11 and 2011-2012 flu seasons linked spontaneous abortions to flu vaccines, finding that women vaccinated with the inactivated influenza vaccine had 3.7-fold greater odds of spontaneous abortion within 23 days than women not receiving the vaccine. 

For women who received the H1N1 vaccine in both seasons covered in the study, the odds of a spontaneous abortion in the 28 days after receiving a flu vaccine was 7.7 times greater. The vast majority of flu vaccines available during the seasons studied were multi-dose formulations containing 25 mcg. of mercury.

Meningococcal vaccines may still contain 25mcg of mercury from thimerosal. Using EPA guidelines for mercury exposure, an individual should weigh 550 lbs. to “safely” process this amount of mercury. Of course, this is based on the INGESTION of methyl mercury. 

No guidelines have been established for INJECTING any form of mercury. Thimerosal is still included in “trace amounts” in other vaccines.

Despite claims made by vaccine pundits and repeated in the media, ethyl mercury found in vaccines is not safer than methyl mercury found in fish. A recent meta-analysis showed that inorganic mercury has a half-life in the brain of several years. 

This is concerning since we know infant primates exposed to equal amounts of ethyl mercury compared to methylmercury were found to have more than double the amount of inorganic mercury deposited into their brain tissue.

While it’s true that ethyl mercury clears the blood more quickly than methyl mercury, the organs of toxicity are the brain and kidneys. Ethyl mercury rapidly crosses into the brain where it gets trapped and is not easily excreted. Clearing the blood does not mean that the ethyl mercury has left the body.

Curiously, one division of the FDA has labelled thimerosal as not being “Generally Recognized As being Safe and Effective (GRASE, while another branch continues to allow the use of thimerosal in vaccines and over 130 prescription drugs.

Sixth claim: The study by Wakefield claiming a link between the MMR vaccine and autism has been disproven. This study was retracted and the author discredited. Other MMR studies prove no link as well

The Wakefield Lancet paper never claimed that the MMR causes autism. Wakefield presented case histories of 12 children with bowel disease and autistic regression their parents claimed occurred after the MMR shot. Wakefield called for more study. From the conclusion: We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described.

Since the paper’s retraction, senior-level CDC scientist turned whistleblower Dr. William Thompson said that a 2004 CDC study found an association with the MMR and the onset of autism in African-American boys and in children with no other developmental concerns before the vaccine, a condition they termed “isolated autism.”

Thompson submitted thousands of documents to Congressman Bill Posey of Florida in 2014, regarding his claims. Subsequently, Congressman Posey made a statement from the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives saying, in part:

Regardless of the subject matter, parents making decisions about their children’s health deserve to have the best information available to them. They should be able to count on federal agencies to tell them the truth.

In August 2014, Dr. William Thompson, a senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, worked with a whistleblower attorney to provide documents related to a 2004 CDC study that examined the possibility of a relationship between [the] mumps, measles, rubella vaccine and autism. 

In a statement released in August 2014, Dr. Thompson stated, ‘I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics.’

Since 2014, the request to allow Dr. William Thompson to testify have been denied by the CDC.

Seventh claim: Autism is genetic, not environmental. There is no epidemic because changing diagnostic criteria explain the rise

There is no such thing as a genetic epidemic and diagnostic substitution cannot account for the skyrocketing numbers of children now diagnosed with autism.

What we can glean from the science is that autism requires an environmental trigger to cause the epidemic increases we’re seeing in not only autism but ADHD, tics, allergies and a laundry list of other childhood disorders that we have not seen in past generations.

Researchers have been searching for the elusive autism gene for decades and still haven’t found it despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars in their pursuit. 

There may be as many as 1,000 genes involved in autism risk and many of the most promising genetic findings are acquired mutations that point to environmental factors as the cause of the mutations. 

The expansion of genetic studies has found that, in families who have two children diagnosed with autism, the siblings often don’t share the same gene changes, which has raised the possibility that the disorder isn’t inherited even when it runs in families. This begs the question of shared environmental factors or risk conditions.

One of the largest twin studies to date published in 2011, also found the role of the environment has been underestimated. The study found that the children's environment represents more than 1/2 the susceptibility: 55% in severe autism and 58% in the broader spectrum, while genetics was involved in 37% and 38% of the risk respectively.

We often hear that autism starts in utero because initial studies that looked at abnormal brain growth associated with autism reported the abnormalities occurred prenatally, but that work has been challenged by Harvard researchers who used advanced imaging techniques and reported that the brain overgrowth was being driven by the white matter of the brain. 

The observed overgrowth of the white matter occurred after birth and may be related to the process of myelination. The white matter overgrowth was also seen in infants with developmental language disorders, which is often one of the first symptoms of autism in children.

Eighth claim: The United States already has a vaccine safety commission

Any appearance of vaccine safety efforts made by the CDC and its pundits is a facade. A government agency charged with ensuring high vaccination uptake in the population should not be entrusted to ensure that vaccines are as safe as possible.

The CDC is in the vaccine business, a tremendous conflict of interest when that same agency is tasked with promoting mass-scale vaccination. According to a 2003 UPI Investigation, the CDC held 28 vaccine licensing agreements at that time. In 2017, another analysis found that the CDC now holds at least 57 parents related to vaccines.

Members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, who determine vaccine recommendations, are allowed to have financial conflicts, some even profiting from the vaccine decisions the committee recommends.

The revolving door between the CDC and the vaccine industry is blatant and has gone unchecked for decades.

Ninth claim: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is an “anti-vaxxer”

This type of bullying terminology is an attempt to censor opinion and silence debate. There are very real problems with vaccine safety, efficacy, pharmaceutical influence in public interest decision making and policy, and conflict of interest among the regulators of our government agencies expected to protect Americans from harm. 

That is the story that needs to be covered. Name calling does nothing to advance the discussion of these critical issues.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. ensured that all of his six children were fully vaccinated. But when he read the independent, peer-reviewed research linking vaccines with serious health conditions and talked to pharmaceutical and government 'experts,' he was convinced that mercury was driving the epidemic of neurological and immunological injuries impacting today’s children in numbers never before seen in history.

Kennedy was also concerned over the lack of true vaccine safety science. The few existing CDC safety studies are rife with errors and additionally, CDC whistleblower Thompson claims some of them to be fraudulent.

Proclaiming that Mr. Kennedy is “anti-vaccine” effectively dismisses not only what tens of thousands of parents have witnessed but also what a growing amount of published, reputable science is bearing out. 

He wants trustworthy regulators who will actually do their jobs in protecting the health of our nation’s citizens. When it comes to the safety and well-being of their children, parents and caregivers have every right to pose questions.

Tenth Claim: Unvaccinated people make others sick. Vaccines should be mandatory with no philosophical, medical or religious exemptions

Vaccine generates money but kills and destroys human beings

Vaccine generates money but kills and destroys human beings


History shows us that vaccinated people can also spread diseases and infections. This is well illustrated by the 2016 Harvard mumps outbreak and the 2017 mumps outbreak at Syracuse University wherein all people diagnosed with mumps had received both recommended doses of the MMR vaccine. 

As mentioned above, according to two former Merck virologists who worked on the mumps portion of the MMR, the mumps vaccine is not effective.

In addition to the lack of efficacy in vaccines such as the MMR, vaccines made with live viruses such as MMR, chicken pox, rotavirus, influenza, and shingles can cause shedding of the viruses to the close contacts of those vaccinated. 

When it comes to the safety and well-being of their children, parents and caregivers have every right to pose questions, no matter the topic. 

Parents research the safest car seats, cribs, strollers and everything else that involves their children. Vaccines should also be on the table for questioning, researching, discussing, or criticizing. And if parents decide to refuse vaccines for their children, those decisions should be respected.

“One size fits all” is a questionable policy when it comes to medical treatment. Knowledgeable doctors realize that there isn’t a single medical procedure that works well for the entire population—and that includes vaccines. 

Published science also supports the fact that some people with genetic predispositions should not have vaccines. We desperately need more research in this area so we can identify those likely to be harmed so we can modify their vaccine schedule. Have we traded acute childhood illness for lifelong chronic disease?

The American public has become increasingly aware of the rapid decline in the health of the nation’s children. They are worried that the ever-expanding childhood vaccine schedule that has tripled since the 1980’s, may be responsible for the current epidemic of serious childhood health conditions. 

These concerns are warranted given the fact that over half of the children in this country, 54%, now have a chronic health condition.

Mandated vaccines are in direct opposition to informed consent, the number one tenet of the Nuremberg Code: The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

Ignoring facts, research and conflicts of interest within regulatory agencies have created a smoke screen to cover the obvious truth of the matter—vaccines are not as safe and effective as our government agencies and mainstream media would have us believe. 

Vaccines can and do cause serious injuries including autism and many other adverse health outcomes.

Monday, June 18, 2018

CAN ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR. FIGHT THE VACCINE MAFIA ALONE?


Robert F. Kennedy: Can he fight the vaccine underworld alone?

Robert F. Kennedy: Can he fight the vaccine underworld alone?


A significant medical advice we often read in the English world is, "If you are experiencing a medical emergency, seek immediate assistance from a healthcare provider or call 911."

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC), as well as the Food & Drug Administration (FDA), do not provide individual medical treatment, advice, or diagnosis. If you need individual medical or healthcare advice, one needs to consult a qualified healthcare provider.

In Spanish they say:

Reporte una Reacción Adversa

Se recomienda que complete el formulario VAERS en línea. Por favor, reporte eventos adversos clínicamente importantes que ocurrieron después de la vacunación de adultos y niños, incluso si no está seguro de si la vacuna causó el evento adverso.

El Sistema para Reportar Eventos Adversas a las Vacunas (VAERS, por sus siglas en inglés) acepta todos los reportes, incluso los reportes de errores de vacunación. Pautas para notificar errores de vacunación están disponibles si usted tiene preguntas adicionales. 

In other languages, the same advice and rules are proclaimed.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

According to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. for many years, public health advocates have vainly urged the CDC and WHO to conduct studies comparing vaccinated vs. unvaccinated populations to measure overall health outcomes. 

Now a team of Scandinavian scientists has conducted such a study and the results are alarming. That study, funded in part by the Danish government and led by Dr. Soren Wengel Mogensen was published in January in EBioMedicine journal. 

Mogensen and his team of scientists found that African children inoculated with the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) vaccine, during the early 1980's, had a 5-10 times greater mortality than their unvaccinated peers.

The data suggests that, while the vaccine protects against infection from those three bacteria, it makes children more susceptible to dying from other causes.

The scientists term the study a “natural experiment” since a birthday-based vaccination system employed for the Bandim Health Project (BHP) in Guinea Bissau, West Africa, had the effect of creating a vaccinated cohort and a similarly situated unvaccinated control group. 

In the time period covered by this study, Guinea-Bissau had 50% child mortality rates for children up to age 5.

Starting in 1978, BHP healthcare workers contacted pregnant mothers and encouraged them to visit infant weighing sessions provided by a BHP team every three months after their child’s birth. 

Beginning in 1981, BHP offered vaccinations at the weighing sessions. Since the DPT vaccine and OPV (oral polio) immunizations were offered only to children who were at least three months of age at the weighing sessions, the children’s random birthdays allowed for analysis of deaths between 3 and 5 months of age depending on vaccination status. 

For example, a child born on January 1st and weighed on April 1st would be vaccinated, but a child born on February 1st would not be vaccinated until their following visit at age 5 months on July 1st.

In the primary analysis, DTP-vaccinated infants experienced mortalities five times greater than DTP-unvaccinated infants. Mortalities to vaccinated girls were 9.98 times those among females in the unvaccinated control group, while mortalities to vaccinated boys were 3.93 times the controls. 

Oddly, the scientists found that children receiving the oral polio vaccine simultaneously with DTP fared much better than children who did not. The OPV vaccine appeared to modify the negative effect of the DTP vaccine, reducing mortalities to 3.52 times those experienced in the control group. 

Overall, mortalities among vaccinated children were 10 times the control group when children received only the DTP.

Mogensen and his colleagues hypothesize that the DTP vaccine might weaken a child’s immune system against non-target infections. They conclude, that though protective against the target disease, DTP may increase susceptibility to unrelated infection. DTP was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated.

No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP.

The Mogensen study supports the conclusions of previous investigations into child survival following vaccination. An earlier study by Dr. Peter Aaby of the introduction of DTP in rural Guinea-Bissau indicated a 2-fold higher mortality among vaccinated children (Aaby et al. 2004a). 

The baby report is one of several early studies that documented vaccination status and followed by children prospectively.  All of them indicated that DTP-vaccinated children died at rates far exceeding mortality amongst the control group. 

A meta-analysis of all eight known studies found a two-fold higher mortality for DTP-vaccinated compared to DTP-unvaccinated.

In 2014, The World Health Organization (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE), conducted its own literature review of the potential non-specific effects (NSEs) of several vaccines, including DTP, and found that the majority of studies reported a detrimental effect of DTP.

(Higgins et al., 2014; Strategic Advisory Group of Experts of Immunization, 2014) due to its penchant for increasing susceptibility to unrelated infections, SAGE recommended further research.

Moreover, Mogensen and his colleagues observe that the studies reviewed by SAGE probably underestimated the lethal effect of the DTP vaccine because of unusually high mortality in the control groups, Unvaccinated children in these studies have usually been frail children too sick or malnourished to get vaccinated.

The studies may, therefore, have underestimated the negative effect of DTP. The Mogensen study sought to avoid this pitfall by using controls selected by birthday and by eliminating underweight children and orphans from both the study group and the control group. It included only children who were breastfed. 

All the infants were healthy at the time of vaccination. Nevertheless, the Mogensen authors point out that, even in their study, the unvaccinated children had slightly worse nutritional status and travelled more – biases that would tend to increase mortality. 

They conclude that “The estimate from the natural experiment may therefore still be conservative.”

The significance of the Mogensen study findings is underscored by the observation that “Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP3 is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs.”

The authors close with a bracing rebuke to public health regulators, "It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis."

Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.” Those words should serve as a cold water wake-up call to the World Health Organization (WHO), the CDC and other public health officials. 

The public in both poor and rich countries has a right to scientifically-based evidence that international vaccine programs are as safe as possible and that they have been thoroughly safety-tested.

The best metrics for measuring safety are studies comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated cohorts. Yet, both the CDC and the WHO have aggressively discouraged the pursuit of such studies.

Finally, it’s important to note that the DTP vaccine used in Guinea-Bissau in the early 1980's almost certainly contained high concentrations of both mercury and aluminum. 

Vaccine makers first created the combined diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine in the 1940's, mixing in an aluminum adjuvant and a mercury preservative (thimerosal) from its inception. 

At that time, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended DTP for mass use in children. Prior to 1990, DTP was the only thimerosal-containing vaccine recommended for infants.

The crime within the medical institutions for vaccination has overflowed its banks

The crime within the medical institutions for vaccination has overflowed its banks


Five manufacturers supplied UNICEF with the DTP vaccines used in West Africa in the late 1970's and early 1980's. One of these, Biken of Japan, described the industry standard in its 1987 lab report: “Outline of Method of Manufacture—The preparation [of DTP] also contains thimerosal as a preservative.”

By the early 1980's, a cascade of lawsuits filed across the United States on behalf of vaccine-injured children was driving DTP manufacturers from the market and threatening to shut down production of the DTP shot and other vaccines. 

That threat led the U.S. Congress to bestow legal immunity on vaccine makers via the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Program in 1986, followed in December 1987 by the rollout of “Vaccine Court.” Following the recommendation by the Institute of Medicine, vaccine makers removed thimerosal from the American DTaP between 2001-2003.

However, multi-dose DTP vaccines given to tens of millions of children across the African continent continue to contain massive doses of thimerosal (25mcg of ethylmercury per injection) that exceed the EPA’s maximum exposure levels by many times. 

Neither the CDC nor the WHO has ever published a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study that would be necessary to determine the overall health impacts of this potent toxin on African children. The Mogensen report is a loud call for such a study.

Sunday, June 17, 2018

REVEALING VOICE OF AN HIV/AIDS THEORY DISSIDENT



Is Africa free of Aids and Ebola? Time will tell


Ebola and Aids will hit Africa in the future as it did in the past because this is the intention of criminal governments and corruptible African regimes. The horrific Aids pandemic tremendously has generated scientific controversies within and outside the scientific establishment.


Only a minority of scientists, like Johan van Dongen, and other engaged people have access to inside information concerning (bio-warfare) Aids and Ebola research.

As an experimental micro-surgeon Johan van Dongen, in the early seventies, almost at the beginning of the multiple organ transplantation eras, has carried out thousands of experimental organ transplantations. In order to deal with organ rejection he administered, radiation and sera for diminishing the immunity of the organ receiver.

Besides that, he also administered uncountable agents to recipients of organs in order to trigger, diminish or completely wipe out the immune capacity which can be compared with Aids.

During his university and hospital appointments in the early seventies, and later undercover in the pharmaceutical industry, he discovered that animals don’t die because of rejection of the transplanted organ but because of multiple infections which can be compared with human Aids victims.

So Johan van Dongen noticed that Aids can be induced by radiation, aflatoxins, Immuran/prednisolone combination, anti-lymphocyte sera and many other bio-warfare agents.

Dormant HIV virus

As head of the Department of Experimental Microsurgery, and involved in all transplantation and immunological experiments, Johan also have been involved in many controversies. Especially the connection of his work and the polemic concerning the transmission of HIV.  

In many ways, he discovered not only in his experiments but also in the extensive scientific literature the role of an obligatory co-factor that trans-activates the “Dormant” virus HIV in specific human cells.

And this obligatory co-factor which transactivates the “Dormant” virus in specific human cells are deliberately introduced into mostly black-skinned African people, governed by massive environmental factors as you can read in our book: “Aids and Ebola the greatest crime in medical history against mankind,” in order to depopulate Africa.

Therefore we will always like to enlighten readers about the real origin of Aids and the true nature of famous international researchers as Robert Gallo and to enlighten him because of his knowledge of the truth about the man-made origin of Aids we present you an open letter of Leroy Whitfield, which can be read under the title: